Tragedy of the Commons Simulation (lab report)
Introduction
The purpose of this simulation is to explore how resources are
used and exploited when they are available to multiple parties. The
"tragedy of the commons" is the situation in which individuals use a
common resource for their own personal gain and degradation of the commons
results, leading to a decrease in yield for both the group and the individual.
This simulation should be written up as a lab report. During the simulation,
all data and notes should be included in your lab notebook.
Materials:
HersheyÕs kisses
Plastic spoons
500ml beakers
Procedure
Part I:
Divide yourselves into groups of four. Imagine this scenario. Each
person represents the head of a starving family which requires food (strong
motivation to acquire food). The only food source for these four families is a
small fishing hole which can accommodate 16 fish. Fortunately, after each round
of fishing by the four family heads, each remaining fish is able to
spontaneously reproduce and make one new fish (i.e. 4 fish become 8, to a
maximum of 16). Each person is allowed to take as many or few fish as you want,
but if you take only one fish, your family will starve.
In this simulation, our pond is a beaker, and our fish are
HersheyÕs kisses. Fish are caught using plastic spoons. Each fishing round will
last for 1 minute. You should rotate your fishing order every round so that
everyone has a chance to go first. At the end of every round, the number of
remaining kisses will be doubled to simulate reproduction. The simulation will
continue for several rounds.
Part II:
This part is exactly like the first, except that in this
simulation, everyone has a private pond in addition to the common pond. The
private ponds can only hold 3 fish although all other rules apply. You may
catch as many fish as you would like from both ponds during each round.
Results:
1. All
data should be recorded in the following chart
|
Round # |
Initial #or fish |
# of taken by fisher1 |
# of taken by fisher 2 |
# of taken by fisher 3 |
# of taken by fisher 4 |
Total left at the end of the round |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I: Commons pond
Part II: Commons pond
|
Round # |
Initial #or fish |
# of taken by fisher1 |
# of taken by fisher 2 |
# of taken by fisher 3 |
# of taken by fisher 4 |
Total left at the end of the round |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II: Private pond
|
Round # |
# of fish at the beg. Of round |
# of fish taken this round |
# of fish left at the end of the round |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Calculate:
* the
total number of fish caught by each person
* the
total amount of fish that could have been taken from the pond over the trial if
the fish had been managed perfectly.
* your
"management score" = what percent of the total possible amount of
fish that could be caught by all fishers, were actually caught?
Your results section should include data tables, and the answers
to the above questions in paragraph form.
Analysis:
Discuss your results in paragraph form, and make sure that you
address the following questions:
-what happened to the common resource in the in Part I? Why?
-did you get different results for the pond in Part II? Why?
-explain the rationale for your fishing technique
-if you cooperated with other fishers, what was the result of that
cooperation?
-did you use different fishing strategies in the common pond and
the private pond?
-why does common usage lead to exploitation?
-what would be the ideal way to manage the common pond?
-how does the number of fish received by each fisher compare to
the maximum possible for each?
-what is your management score and what are some ways that you
could use to improve it?
Conclusion
Briefly summarize the results of this simulation, and discuss the
implications of this simulation on the management of common resources in the
environment. What other resource management examples can you think of where
this topic is relevant? What would you suggest in these situations?